spacer 2Telebyte Gfast Testing Guide 320

Gfast map July 2017

Dark blue: Firm commitments from incumbent: BT (10M), Belgacom, Australian NBN, Swisscom,  Austria, Bezeq Israel, Chunghwa Taiwan, Telus Canada, Telekom South Africa, SK Korea, (U.S.) AT&T, Century, Frontier, Windstream, Belgium, Omantel

Light blue: Smaller carriers in Germany, Norway, Finland, Japan

Green: Incumbent likely:  France, Germany, & Poland  

10-Downing-1805%-10% disparity between ECI & Huawei. Tests in December show Huawei VDSL DSLAMs in Britain have a mean download speed of 32.6 Mbps. ECI DSLAMs measure 30.5 Mbps. The chart below, by Andrew Ferguson of ThinkBroadband, has a series of readings over time that are fairly consistent. Ferguson notes, "Huawei has been slightly ahead since July 2016 after years of being neck and neck." He goes on to speculate the difference may be due to the implementation of G.INP, a very fast error correction method. Broadcom introduced G.INP years ago with some fanfare, but the results were very modest. I had heard things had improved, so this data doesn't surprise me. Andrew writes me he will also be watching the lower target noise margins  BT is testing. They now use 6dB but will be testing 3, 4, 5dB. These are log scales, so even a few dB makes a difference. Lab tests suggest a significant speed increase.

VDSL is now a fairly mature technology, especially the unvectored variety BT is using. G.fast or 35b are newer, so discrepancies are more likely. VDSL manufacturers who had inferior products should have fixed things by now. Most vendors spend their development dollars on new products, so I was pleasantly surprised to see Huawei continues to improve the product.

At Huawei's Tokyo Broadband Forum, I was amazed at the range of their new products. Their research budget is ~$10B and increasing. That's more than their two closest rivals, Nokia and Ericsson, combined. They seem to be spending the money wisely.

Besides the large dataset, Ferguson looks for possible other explanations (confounding variables.) That should be basic for any analysis and earns him extra credibility. 

Speed test Comparison for VDSL2 tests on ECI and Huawei cabinets
 ECIECIHuaweiHuawei
DateMedian Download
Mbps
Mean Download
Mbps
Median Download
Mbps
Mean Download
Mbps
Dec 2016 27.8 30.5 31.4 32.6
Nov 2016 28 30.5 31.3 32.5
Oct 2016 27.5 30.1 30.8 31.9
Sep 2016 27.2 29.5 30.2 31.4
Aug 2016 27.7 30.2 30.4 31.7
Jul 2016 28.7 31.2 31 32.2
Jun 2016 28.6 30.5 30.6 31.5
May 2016 28.2 30 30.5 31.3
Apr 2016 27.8 29.6 29.7 30.5
Mar 2016 27 28.7 28.9 29.8
Feb 2016 27 28.9 29.3 30.2
Jan 2016 27.1 28.8 29.1 29.9
Dec 2015 27.5 29 29.1 29.8
Nov 2015 27.4 29 28.9 29.9
Oct 2015 26.1 27.3 26.6 27.5
Sep 2015 26.3 27.5 26.5

27.6

 

 

 

 

 

 


212 GHz and cDTA are soon shipping from Adtran. True gigabit is here. Sales takeoff is almost in sight, probably Q1 2018.
Australia confirms 1M, AT&T is ready to ramp, DT finally is moving. Omantel and Telkom South Africa are now on the map. Almost all telcos are now choosing G.fast for large buildings when they don't go FTTH. MNet Cologne and Chunghwa Taiwan have changed from fiber all the way to G.fast in the basement.

212 MHz and cDTA Are Ready: Adtran http://bit.ly/GF212cDTA
Frank Miller of Century: G.fast Will be Important to Us http://bit.ly/GFCentury

Carl Russo: Since 2007, I've Been Turning Calix Into a Software Company http://bit.ly/CalixSDN

Adtran Chosen for Australia nbn Fiber to the curb. http://bit.ly/GFnabAus

nbn looking to a million lines. This one is big. Adtran is on a roll, with DT & AT&T also looking good for 2018.

1,400,000,000 In The Works. 1.4 Gigabits http://bit.ly/GF14Gig
South Africa & Connecticut Go Nokia http://bit.ly/SouthAF

Omantel: 90% Fiber & G.fast http://bit.ly/Omantel

 

Read more ...